← presentation-md Comparison · direct rival

presentation-md
vs frontend-slides

frontend-slides won discovery energy — live style previews and bold HTML packs. presentation-md keeps that show-don’t-tell bar, then ships the structured product layer a skill-only repo cannot.

Side-by-side

Criterionpresentation-mdfrontend-slides
Where it runsClaude Code, Cursor, Copilot, Codex, Gemini CLI + MCPAgent prompt packs + HTML template gallery
Authoring model Typed Deck JSON schema (14 layouts incl. chart + custom-html)Freeform / template-guided HTML from prompts
Theme proofs 75 schema-validated structured proofsShowcase HTML templates (discovery-first)
Live theme preview preview_themes MCP (title + layouts bake) Strong live style gallery UX
Design craftAsymmetric ratios, emphasis, bento, image-heroes, surfacesBold visual systems; agent writes full HTML
PowerPoint Native PPTX export + import round-trip + speaker notes HTML-first; no first-class PPTX pipeline
Browser Studio Hosted Studio with craft controls No equivalent editor product
MCP tools 9 typed tools (render, export, audit, themes, brand, import…)Skill / prompt workflow, not a typed MCP product
Brand import CSS / URL → contrast-safe theme packageManual template restyle
Output ownershipSelf-contained HTML you own + optional PPTXSelf-contained HTML you own
License / price Free, MIT, no account Open-source skill / templates

Where frontend-slides is stronger

Where presentation-md is stronger

Verdict

Use frontend-slides when you want maximum HTML freedom and gallery energy. Use presentation-md when the deck must survive re-theme, audit, PPTX handoff, and agent loops — same discovery energy, plus the structured layer competitors cannot match.

Try presentation-md in one command:

npx @presentation-md/install claude-code
Open Studio → See the live compare →

Also compare: all frontend-slides Beautiful.ai Gamma Pitch Canva Tome Slidev Marp Claude Design md-slides